Co-digestion of Shumblan with Different Wastes as a Source for the Biogas Production

Main Article Content

Duaa A. Farhan Farkad A. Lattieff Mohammed A. Atiya

Abstract

Shumblan (SH) is one of the most undesirable aquatic plants widespread in the irrigation channels and water bodies. This work focuses on boosting the biogas potential of shumblan by co-digesting it with other types of wastes without employing any chemical or thermal pretreatments as done in previous studies. A maximum biogas recovery of 378 ml/g VS was reached using shumblan with cow manure as inoculum in a ratio of 1:1. The methane content of the biogas was 55%. Based on volatile solid (VS) and C/N ratios, biogas productions of 518, 434, and 580 ml/g VS were obtained when the shumblan was co-digested with food wastes (SH:F), paper wastes (SH:P), and green wastes (SH:G) respectively. No significant changes of methane contents were observed during the anaerobic co-digestion of shumblan with the selected wastes. This noticeable increments of biogas yields proved that this sort of biomass can be utilized as a promising source for bioenergy production of industrial scale because of its economic operation. Slight pH variations indicated that the co-digestion performance has a good stability operation and no excessive amounts of volatile fatty acid were accumulated. The results also proved that by using co-digestion technology, the biodegradation of shumblan plants could be significantly accelerated supplying greater amounts of biogas yields. Moreover, the appropriate co-digestion with other wastes gave the shumblan high digestibility and, hence, there will be no need to prior pretreatment in order to boost the biogas yield.

Article Details

How to Cite
FARHAN, Duaa A.; LATTIEFF, Farkad A.; ATIYA, Mohammed A.. Co-digestion of Shumblan with Different Wastes as a Source for the Biogas Production. Al-Khwarizmi Engineering Journal, [S.l.], v. 14, n. 4, p. 83- 91, dec. 2018. ISSN 2312-0789. Available at: <http://alkej.com/index.php/en/article/view/744>. Date accessed: 12 dec. 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.22153/https://doi.org/10.22153/kej.2018.04.004.
Section
Articles

References

[1] Escobar, M. M., Voyevoda, M., Fühner, C., & Zehnsdorf, A. (2011). Potential uses of Elodea nuttallii-harvested biomass. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 1(1), 4.
[2] Syaichurrozi, I., & Sumardiono, S. (2013). Predicting kinetic model of biogas production and biodegradability organic materials: biogas production from vinasse at variation of COD/N ratio. Bioresource technology, 149, 390-397.
[3] Córdova, O., Santis, J., Ruiz-Fillipi, G., Zuñiga, M. E., Fermoso, F. G., & Chamy, R. (2017). Microalgae digestive pretreatment for increasing biogas production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
[4] Yadav, D., Barbora, L., Bora, D., Mitra, S., Rangan, L., & Mahanta, P. (2017). An assessment of duckweed as a potential lignocellulosic feedstock for biogas production. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 119, 253-259.
[5] Juntarachat, N. (2017). Evaluation of Biogas Production Potential from Raw and Processed Agricultural Wastes. Energy Procedia, 138, 205-210.
[6] Gaur, R. Z., Khan, A. A., & Suthar, S. (2017). Effect of thermal pre-treatment on co-digestion of duckweed (Lemna gibba) and waste activated sludge on biogas production. Chemosphere, 174, 754-763.
[7] Koyama, M., Yamamoto, S., Ishikawa, K., Ban, S., & Toda, T. (2017). Inhibition of anaerobic digestion by dissolved lignin derived from alkaline pre-treatment of an aquatic macrophyte. Chemical Engineering Journal, 311, 55-62.
[8] Jia, X., Xi, B., Li, M., Yang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2017). Biodegradation of Potamogeton pectinatus biomass by hydrogen and methane coproduction: Effect of different pretreatments and parallel factor analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(29), 18315-18324.
[9] Li, J., Li, R., & Li, J. (2017). Current research scenario for microcystins biodegradation–A review on fundamental knowledge, application prospects and challenges. Science of The Total Environment, 595, 615-632.
[10] Chen, G., Chang, Z., & Zheng, Z. (2014). Feasibility of NaOH-treatment for improving biogas production of digested Spartina alterniflora. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 93, 131-137.
[11] Koyama, M., Yamamoto, S., Ishikawa, K., Ban, S., Toda, T., (2015). Enhancing anaerobic digestibility of lignin-rich submerged macrophyte using thermochemical pretreatment. Biochem. Eng. J. 2015;99: 124-130.
[12] Montingelli, M. E., Tedesco, S., & Olabi, A. G. (2015). Biogas production from algal biomass: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 961-972.
[13] Pastare, L., Romagnoli, F., Lauka, D., Dzene, I., & Kuznecova, T. (2014). Sustainable use of macro-algae for biogas production in Latvian conditions: A preliminary study through an integrated MCA and LCA approach. Environmental and Climate Technologies, 13(1), 44-56.
[14] Sun, L. (2015). Biogas production from lignocellulosic materials (Vol. 2015, No. 83).
[15] Zhen, G., Lu, X., Kobayashi, T., Li, Y. Y., Xu, K., & Zhao, Y. (2015). Mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and Egeria densa: performance assessment and kinetic analysis. Applied energy, 148, 78-86.
[16] Poulsen, T., & Adelard, L. (2014). Effects of organic Waste co-digestion on CH4 generation rate and total CH4 yield. In ICIPEC.
[17] AOAC 2000
[18] Deublein, D. Steinhauser, A. Biogas from waste and renewable resources: an introduction. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
[19] Lattieff, F. A. (2016). A study of biogas production from date palm fruit wastes. Journal of cleaner production, 139, 1191-1195.
[20] Pugliese, A., Bidini, G., & Fantozzi, F. (2015). Anaerobic digestion of macrophytes algae for eutrophication mitigation and biogas production. Energy Procedia, 82, 366-373.
[21] Pastare, L., Romagnoli, F., Rugele, K., Dzene, I., & Blumberga, D. (2015). Biochemical methane potential from anaerobic digestion of the macrophyte Cerathophyllum demersum: a batch test study for Latvian conditions. Energy Procedia, 72, 310-316.
[22] Ofoefule, A. U., Nwankwo, J. I., & Ibeto, C. N. (2010). Biogas Production from Paper Waste and its blend with Cow dung. Advances in applied science Research, 1(2), 1-8.
[23] Taherzadeh, M. J., & Karimi, K. (2008). Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: a review. International journal of molecular sciences, 9(9), 1621-1651.
[24] Montingelli, M. E., Tedesco, S., & Olabi, A. G. (2015). Biogas production from algal biomass: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 961-972.
[25] Bagudo, B. U., Dangoggo, S. M., Hassan, L. G.and Garba, B. (2010). Influence of catalyst (yeast) on the biomethanization of selected organic waste materials. Nigerian J. of Basic and Applied Sci 2010;2: 209-212.
[26] Koyama, M., Nakahashi, N., Ishikawa, K., Ban, S., & Toda, T. (2017). Anaerobic co-digestion of alkali-pretreated submerged macrophytes and acidified food waste for reduction of neutralizing agents. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 125, 208-213.
[27] Krustok, I., Nehrenheim, E., Odlare, M., Liu, X., & Li, S. (2013). Cultivation of indigenous algae for increased biogas production. In International Conference on Applied Energy, ICAE2013, Pretoria, South Africa.
[28] Koyama, M., Yamamoto, S., Ishikawa, K., Ban, S., & Toda, T. (2014). Anaerobic digestion of submerged macrophytes: chemical composition and anaerobic digestibility. Ecological engineering, 69, 304-309.